| Customers Ratings/Reviews (Number of Reviews: 3) Overall: | Read Reviews Below! |
| ||
95% of Fit Survey respondents said this shoe "Felt true to width"
95% of Fit Survey respondents said this shoe had "Excellent arch support"
Customer Rating/Review
Timberland Mt. Washington City Chelsea Update
Number of reviews: 3
Average customer ratings:
Overall:
2009-11-17 07:39:30 Timberland Mt. Washington City Chelsea Update
Reviewer: Anonymous from SF bay area, USA
Overall:
Great that it comes in two widths. A little snug around the top of the ankle but foot bed is very comfortable right out of the box. A stiffer boot than my blundstones.
2009-10-29 12:02:07 Timberland Mt. Washington City Chelsea Update
Reviewer: Anonymous from Atlanta, GA, USA
Overall:
Shoe Size: Felt a full size smaller than marked
Shoe Width: Felt wider than marked
Shoe Arch: Moderate arch support
Nice boot, but try 1/2 to a full size smaller. And the wide is really wide and I have paddles for feet. Typically a 4E in other shoes. I've never put on shoes that made my flippers feel narrow. If you have wide feet, this boot is for you.
2009-10-15 00:23:47 Timberland Mt. Washington City Chelsea Update
Reviewer: J. R. from San Diego, CA, USA
Overall:
Shoe Size: Felt true to size
Shoe Width: Felt true to width
Shoe Arch: Excellent arch support
Great update to the Torrance - I needed to replace my three year-old Timberland Torrance Chelsea boots, and was distraught when I saw they were being discontinued. Ordered the Mt. Washington because it was supposed to be the "update." Differences from the Chelsea: the arch support is a lot more prominent, the opening to insert your foot is larger (not as tight on the ankle), and the front loop to aid with putting on the boot is larger and fixed on the front. Except for the front loop change, the Mt. Washington is a welcome comfortable and solid update. Matches with casual, business, and formal attire.
Top